The
right to know
Commentary by Michelle
Fitzhugh-Craig

British philosopher
Francis Bacon once said, “For also knowledge
itself is power.”
The statement — often paraphrased
as “knowledge is power” — suggests
that with knowledge or education, a person’s
potential or abilities in life can increase.
In less
than four weeks, voters across the country will go
to the polls to cast their vote for president of
the United States. In California and closer to home,
there also are local and state candidates, ballot
measures and propositions for voters to consider.
Many of us — especially those of African descent
and others of color — are prepared to participate
in a freedom granted under the 15th Amendment. Unfortunately,
thousands of California residents don’t have
the knowledge that they do have the right to vote.
For centuries, long before the days of Jim Crow — a
period when laws were enacted, beginning in the late
1800s, to continue to segregate people of color — there
was a widespread belief that once a person was incarcerated,
they no longer deserved the right to vote. Most states,
including this one, still place restrictions on people
convicted of a felony offense for at least some period
of time.
But what is that period of time?
Many believe
that once the label of felon is placed on them, they
can forget about having a say in who is to lead our
country — the country they live in and more
often than not, work in and pay taxes to. They are
told that once they are shipped off to prison, they
can’t vote.
It’s true … while
in prison, they can’t vote. But once they gain
their freedom, there are thousands who regain their
voting rights and don’t even know it. In the
state of California, if a person is on probation — not
parole — or in jail — not prison — they
still have the right to vote.
Let me say that again:
A felon who is not incarcerated in one of our state’s
prison facilities and not on parole come Nov. 4,
and is registered to vote, can vote.
And according
to a newly released report from the American Civil
Liberties Union of Northern California, improper
information, or the lack thereof, given to those
who have served time is a from of felony disenfranchisement
and one of the single greatest factors excluding
people of color from the political process.
“Research
conducted by the ACLU of Northern California from
2005 to 2008 revealed that individuals with felony
convictions and relevant government agencies did
not have accurate information about the limitations
of California’s felony disenfranchisement law,” writes
report author and ACLU-NC executive director Maya
Harris in her introduction. “… We learned
that probation officers, sheriffs and local elections
officials incorrectly believed that individuals cannot
vote ever again if they have a felony conviction;
cannot vote unless they have their conviction expunged;
and/or cannot vote while on probation.”
What?!
Now I consider myself to be a highly educated lady,
but I always thought a felony record prohibits one
from ever voting again.
Now some may say once a felon
always a felon. And whether those in prison can vote
or not is for another discussion. But unless a person
is convicted of voter fraud, what gives anyone the
right to permanently take away someone else’s
voice in the electoral process? And more importantly,
who has the right to keep this information from — or
at least to not disseminate it to — all those
that it affects?
In a time when every vote really
counts, it is important for us all to have the knowledge
of voting rights.
Who knows … the future of
our country may depend upon it. And maybe making
sure that people know they have the right to vote
will give them the knowledge needed to help increase
their potential or ability in life.
For more information
or to view the full report, visit www.aclunc.org.
Michelle Fitzhugh-Craig
is an award-winning, professional journalist who
resides in Oakland. If you have an individual, organization,
issue or other topic that may be of interest to the
Globe’s
readers, contact her at talk2mfc@yahoo.com. |